Advocacy Organizations, Africa, Alfred, Alfred de Zayas, Alfred-Maurice de Zayas, Anand Grover, Australia, Bradley Manning, Brussels, Camp Ashraf, Charter of the United Nations, Civil society, climate, Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, Crime against peace, de Zayas, Democracy, Dignity, Edward Snowden, Ethiopia, European Parliament, France, French, General Assembly, Geneva, Government, history, Holland, Human Right, human rights, Human Rights and Liberties, Human Rights Committee, humanity, International Court of Justice, international justice, international law, International Law Commission, International law; Egypt; Syria; Democracy; Alfred de Zayas; Justice; Revolution; Arab Spring; Humanity;, Iran, Iraq, Julian Assange, Kashmir, law, Majority rule, middle-east, Morocco, National Security Agency, New York, Non-governmental organization, Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Peace, politics, Representative democracy, Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Security Council, Soviet Union, Special Rapporteur, Switzerland, The Independent, The Netherlands, Twitter, UN, UN Parliamentary Assembly, UNHCR, UNHRC, Unilateralism, United Nations, United Nations Charter, United Nations General Assembly, United Nations General Assembly resolution, United Nations Human Rights Council, United Nations Parliamentary Assembly, United Nations Security Council, United Nations Special Rapporteur, United States, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Universal Periodic Review, UNPA, War of aggression, Whistleblower, World Bank, World Parliamentary Assembly, World Trade Organization, World War II
Realpolitik in the 21st century has learned how to instrumentalize human rights rhetoric to pursue traditional geopolitical and hegemonial agendas — hitherto with remarkable success, since broad sectors of civil society actually fall for the propaganda disseminated by a well orchestrated corporate media and supported by an accommodating “human rights industry”, too often compliant and complicit with the business enterprises that dish out donations and engender long-term dependencies. Just watch them deploy their multiple campaigns to join human rights bandwagons, fashions, “the flavour of the month”, while exercising self-censorship on weightier human rights problems such as abject poverty, lack of clean water and minimal health care!
This industry has a convenient fig-leaf function and serves to advance those human rights that are business-friendly and likely to generate profits — notwithstanding the misery of millions of human beings who lack everything, those “unsung victims” of the irrelevant “third world”. This widespread approach builds on the “trickle-down” phantasy, according to which if the rich become richer, then some excess wealth eventually will make its way down to the poor. Alas, this hypothesis is but a rip-off system that only aggravates the situation and negates any and all hope of human solidarity. But there is enough pious opium for the masses, pathos for adolescents — and panem et circensis for the rest of us.